sab39

... indistinguishable from magic
effing the ineffable since 1977
Books

Books

12/30/2004
I got two books and a couple of bookstore gift certificates for Christmas so I've read three books in the last three days. I enjoyed all three very much; however, I wouldn't be me if I couldn't find some nits to pick. So here are my comments on the three books I read, in order - both the good points and the bad.
  • The Full Cupboard of Life, by Alexander McCall Smith. The latest (and, I suspect, last: most of the loose ends now seem tied) book in the "No. 1 Ladies Detective Agency" series, this book was more of the same, in a good way. Mma Ramotswe and Mr J.L.B. Maketoni's lives in small-town Botswana continue with the same mixture of drama, laid-back introspective insight and understated humor ("In her mind, her shoes always addressed her as Boss, which was good. Shoes should know their place.") as the previous books. The only nit I have to pick with this book is that it is "more of the same" and was more of a comfortable revisiting of old friends than a riveting page-turner. Not that there's anything wrong with that.
  • The Sunday Philosophy Club, also by Alexander McCall Smith. The start of a new series, this one is set in Scotland and the protagonist is Isabel, the part-time editor of a philosophy journal who obsesses over crossword puzzles and theoretical questions of morality. I initially found Isabel rather pretentious, but as the book progressed I began to recognize aspects of my own personality in hers, especially her desire to reduce things to abstract general principles and her need to occasionally remind herself not to be condescending. The humor in this book is in the same vein as the Ladies Detective Agency series, but perhaps a little less subtle; I found this to be an improvement. The principal weakness in this book lay in the plot - some events were blatantly obvious well in advance (at one point it was almost painful to watch Isabel fail to realize the obvious for several pages) while others were unpleasantly jarring. I have no problem with unexpected plot twists in general, but usually I'd expect them to be surprising only in advance - in hindsight you wonder how you didn't see them coming. In this book I was more inclined to wonder how I could ever have been expected to. The greatest cardinal sin of the book, though, was the introduction of two crossword puzzles in the second chapter - "Excited by the score (7)" and "Vulnerable we opined desultorily (4, 4)" - to which the book did not reveal the solutions. Surely I'm not the only reader who is now going crazy trying to figure these out? (If you do, please let me know the answers in the comments of this post.) If nothing else, the author deserves to be hung over a pit of scorpions for that one, although if the answers turn out to be clues to the plot I would be prepared to consider that a mitigating circumstance. All in all, I have bridled enthusiasm (Click the link. Trust me. It's worth it.) for this book.
  • The Bad Beginning, the first in the Series of Unfortunate Events by Lemony Snicket. I had heard that these books were akin to Harry Potter, but I disagree. Unlike HP, this was unquestionably a children's book. The plot was transparent to any adult reader and the characters were mostly caricatures of stereotypes. This didn't stop it from being a very enjoyable read, though, and the humor of the writing style had me laughing aloud on several occasions. One thing I did find extremely annoying was the habit of explaining words to the reader, which came across as patronizing (a word which here means "treating the reader as if they did not have a basic knowledge of English that even a child ought to possess") and left me feeling rather persnickety ("persnickety" means "annoyed", while also being a clever pun on the author's name). See what I mean? I found these forgivable when the explanation was also a joke, but just irritating the rest of the time. Still undecided on whether to buy the rest of the books and/or see the movie.
Referee?
By Stuart at 2004/12/30 16:43

Could "Excited by the score" be "referee"? It's a stretch, but "cited" means "referred", and someone who is "referred" could be a "referee". The connection between referees and scores is obvious if a little tenuous, but I'm not sure about the "ex" part or whether the word "by" is supposed to be significant.

Only you...
By Your wife. at 2005/01/02 08:44

would comment to your own post.;)

Would you have preferred...
By Stuart at 2005/01/03 11:23

... for me to do a whole fresh post just to cover a guess at the crossword clue?

Excited by the score
By Kez (Email) at 2005/06/13 00:50

"Score" being XX in Roman numerals, how does this fit in with "ex" & "cited". I assume there's an anagram of "excited" involved, as the solution is 7 letters long.

Excited still more by the score
By Kez (Email) at 2005/06/14 04:14

Maybe that should have been "Cited ex". Seems a bit tame though.
but..
"Vulnerable we opined desultorily (4,4)" would probably be an anagram of "we opined" so the answer could be
"wide open" which definitely matches vulnerable, I'm just not sure where "desultorily" comes in.

Excited by the score?
By Andy Little (Email) at 2007/12/03 16:21

Reckon the solution is AROUSED. With reference to score meaning to have a successful sexual encounter.

Add a comment:
Subject:
Name:
Email:
Url:
Title: Don't enter anything here if you're a human.
CAPTCHA: Don't enter anything here if you're a human.
Comment: